Chat with us, powered by LiveChat
Courses Testimonials

The SCS Ultimate Interactive Guide.

Everything you need for CIMA’s Strategic Case Study, in one place — the blueprint, the official pre-seen, the writing technique, and five realistic Kwirtmak mocks with full model answers. Free, and yours to read like a book at your own pace.

Begin reading

Use the ← → arrow keys to walk through chapters at your own pace.

What is the SCS

The final case study exam within the CIMA professional qualification.

The SCS tests your ability to apply your E3, P3 and F3 knowledge in a realistic business scenario. You play the role of a senior finance professional, working closely with the Board and senior management to support strategic decision-making, evaluate risks and opportunities, and help shape the long-term direction of the organisation.

The SCS is not about calculations or technical knowledge. It is about analysing complex strategic issues, evaluating courses of action and making well-justified recommendations in the context of the business. Generic textbook answers score poorly. Balanced evaluation, commercial awareness and strong scenario-specific application score well.

E3
Strategic Management
Strategic analysis, strategic choice, strategic implementation, digital strategy, innovation and change management.
P3
Risk Management
Strategic risk, enterprise risk management, internal controls, cyber risk, project risk, governance and managing uncertainty in strategic decisions.
F3
Financial Strategy
Business valuation, mergers and acquisitions, corporate financing, treasury management, international finance and shareholder value creation.
The five core activities

What CIMA is actually testing.

The exam simulates the real job of a senior-level finance professional. You are not sitting a theory test — you are being assessed on whether you can do the job and recommend the path for the business. CIMA condenses that job into five core activities, each with a weighting range. Every task in the exam will link to one of them.

  1. A

    Develop business strategy

    Evaluate strategic options, acquisitions and digital and sustainability responses, then recommend the strategic decisions that best position the organisation for the long term.

    15–25%
  2. B

    Evaluate the business ecosystem and environment

    Set strategic objectives, apply analytical tools, assess stakeholder needs, and recommend responses to changes in the ecosystem and to economic, political and currency risk.

    15–25%
  3. C

    Recommend financing strategies

    Recommend suitable sources of finance and dividend policy, and apply business valuation models to acquisition, investment and shareholder-value decisions.

    15–25%
  4. D

    Evaluate and mitigate risk

    Evaluate strategic, cyber and ethical risks, maintain the corporate risk register, and recommend responses and internal controls that protect the business.

    15–25%
  5. E

    Recommend and maintain a sound control environment

    Apply internal audit, recommend appropriate controls, evaluate the implications of compliance failures, and respond to threats arising from poor governance.

    15–25%

All five activities carry a similar weighting (15–25% each), so none can be neglected. They map onto your E3, P3 and F3 syllabus — cover those well and you can satisfy these activities and score strongly on this paper.

Each core activity comes with a set of "I can" statements — the specific skills being tested. They are not a reading list. They tell you exactly what the examiner expects you to be able to do as a senior finance professional: evaluate strategic options and justify recommendations, assess enterprise-wide risks and governance implications, analyse acquisitions, financing and investment decisions, evaluate long-term value creation, or advise the Board on complex strategic challenges. Every "I can" statement is a potential exam task. Treat each as a practical skill you must be able to apply in the context of the case company.

View all "I can" statements (A–E)
A

Develop business strategy

  • I can evaluate strategic options.
  • I can recommend strategic decisions.
  • I can evaluate potential acquisitions and divestment opportunities.
  • I can recommend responses to opportunities and threats arising from digital technologies.
  • I can recommend responses to sustainability issues.
B

Evaluate the business ecosystem and environment

  • I can recommend appropriate financial, non-financial and sustainability-related strategic objectives.
  • I can select and apply suitable strategic analytical tools.
  • I can conduct an analysis of stakeholder needs and recommend appropriate responses.
  • I can recommend appropriate responses to changes in the business ecosystem.
  • I can recommend KPIs that encourage sound strategic management.
  • I can recommend responses to economic, political and currency risks.
C

Recommend financing strategies

  • I can recommend suitable sources of finance.
  • I can recommend dividend policy.
  • I can recommend and apply business valuation models.
D

Evaluate and mitigate risk

  • I can evaluate risks and recommend responses, and maintain the corporate risk register.
  • I can identify ethical dilemmas and recommend suitable responses.
  • I can evaluate and mitigate cyber risks.
  • I can recommend internal controls.
E

Recommend and maintain a sound control environment

  • I can apply internal audit resources.
  • I can recommend appropriate controls and evaluate the implications of compliance failures.
  • I can recommend responses to threats arising from poor governance.
The preseen

You get a head start, but only if you study it properly.

Around seven weeks before the exam, you receive a 20–30 page document describing a fictional company: its background, environment and key issues. You study it in advance so that on exam day you already know the business.

Preseen A
November & the following February
share the same preseen.
Preseen B
May & the following August
share the same preseen.

The pre-seen runs to 20–30 pages, but the issues that actually matter for the exam can be distilled into a sharper summary. Read our overview first, then go back to the official CIMA document with a sharper eye.

Finntutors summary

Kwirtmak Pre-Seen Overview

Strategic issues, financials, SWOTs and key exam themes — distilled into a sharper read.

View PDF
Official · Published by CIMA · 27 pages

Kwirtmak SCS Pre-Seen (current sitting)

The actual pre-seen document released by CIMA for the current SCS exam window.

View PDF
Important topics revision

The topics that keep coming up in the SCS.

Across recent sittings, certain technical topics have appeared repeatedly, often within different business scenarios. The exact question is always new, but a strong grasp of these themes makes it much easier to spot the key issues and respond with confidence. We've pulled them into a single summary file so your mocks are written on a base of solid, exam-ready technical knowledge.

EthicsCurrency risksAcquisitions & their implicationsGovernance issuesRisk-related decision makingStakeholder managementInternal auditInternal controlsInterest-rate risksScenario planningShare-price fluctuationsTypes of risk & their effectsRaising finance — debt & equitySFACyber security & cyber riskDividend policyBoard committeesESG / sustainability reporting
Most Important SCS Topics to First Revise
Finntutors summary notes · ranked by exam frequency
Download PDF
On exam day

Three hours. Three questions. One Senior Finance Manager: you.

Each question contains two tasks, all set inside the same preseen company. Your job is to read the email from your senior, work on the direction or help where needed, and write professional, scenario-specific advice.

3
Questions in the paper
2
Tasks per question
3hrs
Total exam length
Finance
Manager
Your role: advising the Board and senior management
Format & delivery

Computer-based. Four sittings a year.

The SCS is sat at Pearson VUE centres, or remotely where available. There are four sittings per year: February, May, August and November.

The current syllabus is the 2019 syllabus with a few updates announced and incorporated within Finntutors’ 2026 material.

Prerequisites

Three ways to get to SCS. One way out.

Before sitting the SCS you must have closed out the E3, P3 and F3 knowledge, by one of three routes. Completing the SCS and your subsequent PER earns you the ACMA, CGMA designation.

Route 1 · Objective Tests
Pass the three Strategic level Objective Tests (E3, P3, F3) and then sit the SCS.
Route 2 · Exemptions
Receive exemptions for the Objective Tests and sit the SCS directly.
Route 3 · FLP
Complete the FLP competencies (which embed E3, P3 and F3) before sitting the SCS.
All three routes converge. → Sit the SCS → Complete PER → ACMA, CGMA designation.
What the examiner is looking for

Technical knowledge alone does not pass.

The examiner wants to see that you think and behave like a senior finance professional, not that you can recall content. Three qualities run through every marking grid.

Communication

Writing clearly and professionally, as if you are addressing a real manager. Short sentences. Logical structure. Plain English over jargon.

Professional judgement

Making sensible, reasoned recommendations. Weighing trade-offs. Reaching a conclusion when the task asks for one and being willing to take a view.

Business acumen

Understanding the bigger picture of what the company is trying to achieve and how the finance lens connects to operations, customers and strategy.

Details of mock writing

Everything from here is about how to actually write the answer.

Up to now we've covered what the exam is, how it is built, and what to study. The next sections — command verbs, planning, PEA writing, levels-based marking — are about translating that knowledge into marks. Start by looking at what a real SCS question actually looks like.

Sample question

What does a case study question look like?

From: Agata Paluch, Finance Director
To: Senior Finance Manager
Subject: Xland acquisition – managing risk and cybersecurity governance

Agata Paluch, Kwirtmak's Finance Director, stops by your office and gives you a document:

“Following Board approval, Kwirtmak has now completed the acquisition of the Advanced Materials Facility in Xland. This is a major step in building our capabilities in carbon fibre and other advanced materials. However, the Board is increasingly concerned about the risks associated with operating in Xland, particularly given recent cybersecurity incidents affecting industrial companies in the region. I need you to prepare a report that covers two matters:

Firstly, recommend, with reasons, the approach that Kwirtmak should now take to manage the political and operational risks in Xland following the acquisition. [sub-task (a) = 50%]

Secondly, evaluate the arguments for treating Kwirtmak's cybersecurity as a strategic issue that should be overseen directly by the Board.” [sub-task (b) = 50%]

Reference material — Xland Expansion and Risk Context

Kwirtmak has recently acquired the Advanced Materials Facility located next to its existing production site in Xland. The facility specialises in carbon fibre composites.

The acquisition is expected to support Kwirtmak's strategy of expanding its product offering beyond traditional materials such as plastics, metals and ceramics.

Operating in Xland also introduces additional risks. Recent reports suggest that industrial companies in the region have been subject to cyber-attacks targeting design systems, production processes and supply chain networks. Given Kwirtmak's reliance on CAD software, digital design files and connected production systems, it may be particularly exposed.

There are also concerns about the broader political and regulatory environment in Xland. The government has shown increasing interest in controlling access to strategic technologies and industrial data, particularly where foreign-owned businesses are involved. This could lead to restrictions on data transfer, tighter compliance requirements, and increased operational uncertainty.

Corporate governance guidance highlights that risks such as cybersecurity and supply chain resilience are becoming more critical for technology-based manufacturers.

How to read it

The seven things to identify before you start writing.

  1. 01

    The unseen information

    The unseen is the new information given to you on exam day. Two things are happening here: Kwirtmak has completed the acquisition of the Advanced Materials Facility in Xland — a facility specialising in carbon fibre composites — and industrial companies in Xland have been hit by cyber-attacks targeting design systems, production processes and supply chain networks. Kwirtmak is particularly exposed because of its reliance on CAD software, digital design files and connected production systems. On top of this, the Xland government is tightening its grip on strategic technologies and industrial data held by foreign-owned businesses, which means data-transfer restrictions and compliance requirements are likely to increase.

  2. 02

    The task

    Two tasks, clearly separated. Sub-task (a): recommend, with reasons, how Kwirtmak should manage political and operational risks in Xland following the acquisition. Sub-task (b): evaluate the arguments for treating cybersecurity as a Board-level strategic issue. Sub-task (a) is a risk-management question; sub-task (b) is a corporate-governance question. Keep them separate in your answer — do not let them bleed into each other.

  3. 03

    The mark weighting

    Both sub-tasks carry 50% each — equal time, equal depth, equal effort on both. The most common mistake here is spending too long on risk management because it feels more familiar, then rushing the governance evaluation. Treat both halves as two separate mini-questions of equal importance.

  4. 04

    How the scoring works

    The exam is marked out of 100 and scaled to 150 — you need 80 out of 150 to pass. Generic risk frameworks or cybersecurity theory without Kwirtmak-specific application will score poorly. Every point you make should connect back to something in the unseen or the pre-seen. The examiner wants practical business advice, not textbook definitions.

  5. 05

    How much to actually write

    Each sub-task is 50% — roughly 16 to 17 marks each. As a ballpark, one well-explained, Kwirtmak-specific argument is worth around 4 marks, so you are looking for four solid points per sub-task — not more. You may have ten ideas, but we want the best four only. A well-explained point is five to six sentences. Do not write ten shallow points hoping to cover the marks; four deep, well-applied arguments will always outscore a list of ten one-liners. For (a), four points on political and operational risk, each identifying a specific risk, why it matters for Kwirtmak, and a clear recommended response. For (b), four points evaluating whether cybersecurity belongs in the boardroom rather than the IT department.

  6. 06

    The reference material

    These are the specific facts available to apply — use them: the facility is located next to Kwirtmak's existing Xland production site and specialises in carbon fibre composites; the acquisition supports the strategy of expanding beyond plastics, metals and ceramics; cyber-attacks in Xland have targeted design systems, production processes and supply chain networks; Kwirtmak's exposure is heightened through its CAD software and digital design files; the Xland government is restricting access to strategic technologies and industrial data for foreign-owned businesses; and corporate-governance guidance flags cybersecurity and supply-chain resilience as critical priorities for technology-based manufacturers.

  7. 07

    The command verbs

    The verbs tell you exactly what to do. Sub-task (a) says recommend with reasons — for every risk you identify, state what Kwirtmak should do and explain why that response makes sense in the Xland context. Do not just list risks. Sub-task (b) says evaluate — engage with the arguments critically, not just list reasons why cybersecurity matters. Ask yourself: does this risk genuinely belong at Board level, or can it be managed operationally? Then make the case.

Key SCS command verbs

Every task begins with a verb. The verb decides the answer.

Tasks typically use verbs such as Evaluate, Discuss, Interpret, Recommend, Analyse and Identify. The verb tells you how deep to go and what shape your answer takes. In the SCS you are almost always operating at Level 4 (analysis) or Level 5 (evaluation) — and whichever verb is used, you must always apply it to the specific scenario in the case.

Level 5 — Evaluation
Evaluate

Judge how good something is, in depth. Look at advantages and disadvantages, consider risks and long-term impact, and give a clear final judgement.

Assess

Judge how important or serious something is, in depth, for the business — and explain its impact.

Recommend

Suggest the best course of action in depth and clearly explain why it should be chosen.

Advise

Give practical, professional guidance to management on what they should do next, in depth.

Justify

Provide strong reasons and evidence to support a particular decision or viewpoint, in depth.

Review

Check something carefully and in depth, and decide whether it needs changes.

Level 4 — Analysis
Analyse

Break the issue into parts, explain causes and effects in depth, and link it to business strategy.

Discuss

Examine in detail by argument — present both sides, explain each, and give a balanced conclusion.

Examine

Study the issue in detail to understand what is happening, and why, in depth.

Interpret

Explain what the data or information means, in depth, for the business decision.

Critically evaluate

Deeply analyse and question assumptions before giving a well-reasoned judgement.

Finntutors planning framework

4 + 4 + 4. Plan every section before you write a word.

You have 60 minutes per section. Spend the first 12 to 15 minutes planning. Three stages of roughly four minutes each. The students who skip this phase always finish under-time and under-scored.

  1. 4 minFirst four

    Read and understand the scenario

    Read the unseen email or conversation carefully. Who is asking, what has happened, what needs addressing. Note the names, the unseen themes, the things that stand out. Absorb the situation fully before thinking about your answer.

  2. 4 minSecond four

    Decode the sub-tasks

    Read every sub-task. For each, identify the command verb and the weighting. Read them all before answering any of them. This stops you covering later content too early and leaving yourself empty.

  3. 4 minThird four

    Plan your sub-headings

    Jot down the sub-headings for each sub-task. Think about the technical knowledge that applies, what the preseen tells you about this company, and what new detail the unseen has introduced. You are building a skeleton, not writing sentences yet.

Finntutors writing framework

PEA. Every paragraph, every time.

PEA stands for Point, Explanation, Application. It is the structure for every single point you make. Once you have planned, every paragraph follows this pattern. A PEA paragraph written well earns Level 3 marks.

P

Point

State your point clearly and directly in one sentence. Do not build up to it. Lead with it.

E

Explanation

Explain why this point matters or how it works. This is where the technical knowledge comes in. One to two sentences is usually enough.

A

Application

Link the point directly to the company. Use the name, the specific numbers, the situation from the preseen or unseen. This is what separates a pass from a borderline answer.

How marking actually works

Levels-based marking. The same answer at each level.

The SCS does not tick correct facts. The examiner reads your whole answer and places it in Level 1, 2 or 3. Three things decide which: clarity, depth, and application to the scenario. Using sub-task (a) from the Kwirtmak Xland question — and taking one point only, political risk: government control over strategic technologies and data — here is the same point answered at each level.

The task: Recommend, with reasons, the approach that Kwirtmak should now take to manage the political and operational risks in Xland following the acquisition.
Level 1 Some understanding Generic. Could apply to any business operating overseas.

Kwirtmak should monitor the political environment in Xland and take steps to manage the risks associated with operating there. Political risk can affect a company's operations and it is important that management are aware of this.

Level 2 Reasonable understanding Explained well, but not applied to Kwirtmak.

Kwirtmak should assess the political risks associated with operating in Xland and put measures in place to manage them. Governments in some regions can restrict access to technology and data, particularly for foreign-owned businesses. This could affect Kwirtmak's ability to operate freely and may result in additional compliance costs. Management should engage with local regulators and seek legal advice to ensure the business remains compliant with local requirements.

Level 3 Good understanding Specific, applied, scenario-anchored.

Recommend active engagement with regulators and compliance management: It is recommended that Kwirtmak actively engages with regulators in Xland and strengthens its compliance processes. Governments are increasingly interested in controlling access to strategic technologies and industrial data. This is a direct risk for Kwirtmak because its printers rely heavily on CAD systems, digital design files and proprietary technology. If access to this data is restricted, it could disrupt operations and innovation. By maintaining strong relationships with regulators and ensuring compliance with local laws, Kwirtmak can reduce the risk of sudden regulatory restrictions.

Recommend protecting intellectual property and structuring operations carefully: Kwirtmak should keep critical design capabilities and advanced R&D activities outside Xland where possible, and structure operations so that high-value decision-making remains in more stable jurisdictions, reducing political exposure.

The takeaway. Every student walking into this exam knows that political risk can affect overseas operations — that knowledge alone is Level 1. The jump to Level 3 comes from asking three questions before you write: what is the specific political risk Kwirtmak faces, why does it matter for this company specifically, and what should Kwirtmak actually do about it. Read your sentence back: if it could appear in an answer about any company acquiring any overseas facility, it needs one more layer of application.
Common mistakes

What costs students marks every sitting.

Most students who fail know enough content to pass. The marks are lost in how the answers are written. Five mistakes show up across every sitting.

  1. 01

    Writing generically instead of applying to the company

    The single biggest reason students drop from Level 3 to Level 2. Technically correct answers that could apply to any business. If your answer does not mention the company by name, reference its specific situation, and use the reference material or details from the preseen or unseen, it will not reach Level 3.

  2. 02

    Ignoring the command verb

    Writing a discuss answer when the task says identify. Writing a list when the verb is evaluate, missing the judgement the marks depend on. Every task starts with a verb. Read it. Match it.

  3. 03

    Misallocating time across sub-tasks

    Spending too long on the first comfortable sub-task and running out of time for the rest. Levels-based marking means a brilliant answer on one sub-task cannot compensate for a missing answer on another. A complete Level 2 on every sub-task beats Level 3 on one and nothing on the next.

  4. 04

    No planning before writing

    Diving straight in produces rambling, unstructured answers that jump between points without clear logic. 4+4+4 per section produces tighter answers, ensures every sub-task is covered, and almost always reaches a higher level than unplanned writing.

  5. 05

    Making points without explaining them

    A point with no explanation sits at Level 1. Students list five or six correct ideas in quick succession but never develop any of them. One well-explained, well-applied point is worth more than three undeveloped ones.

Seven-week preseen plan

What to do with the preseen, week by week.

Most students re-read the preseen and call it studying. This is what tutors actually do across the seven weeks between release and exam day.

  1. Week 1Understand the exam

    Understand what the SCS is testing before you touch the pre-seen

    The SCS sits at the strategic level — the examiner expects you to think like a senior advisor, not a middle manager. Before you open the pre-seen, pick up the blueprint and understand the five core activities, how marks are awarded, and what the command verbs at this level actually demand. The SCS applies E3, P3 and F3 knowledge to complex, multi-layered business situations. If you are studying with us, everything is structured from day one and our WhatsApp group is live for questions throughout.

  2. Week 2Enter the pre-seen

    Read the pre-seen properly — not just once, but with a purpose

    Read it like a new board member preparing for their first meeting. You are not skimming for facts — you are building a picture of the business: its strategic position, the key stakeholders and where conflicts might arise, its financial health, the governance structure, the strategic, operational, financial and reputational risks, and where E3, P3 and F3 map onto the company's reality. If you are studying with us, we have already done this mapping for you so you can focus on understanding rather than hunting.

  3. Week 3Strategic depth

    Go deeper on the strategy and governance layers

    Work through the pre-seen with strategic lenses in mind: what strategic options does the company face (growth, diversification, acquisition, withdrawal)? What are the governance risks? What does the financial position mean strategically? Where are the ethical dilemmas likely to emerge? Continue your topic-by-topic technical revision alongside this — if you cannot confidently evaluate a strategic acquisition, assess board-level risk oversight, recommend a financing structure or analyse stakeholder conflict, your answers will not move beyond surface-level analysis. Our twice-weekly live lessons every Wednesday and Friday at 6pm UK time focus on exactly these skills.

  4. Week 4Writing for marks

    Learn how marks are actually awarded at SCS level

    The examiner at this level expects integrated thinking. Study the command verbs — evaluate, recommend, advise, assess — and understand what each demands. Learn what a Level 3 answer looks like versus Level 1 or 2, and that one well-developed, scenario-specific argument is worth more than three generic observations. Start submitting mocks for marking and study the model answers to understand why certain points score and others do not. With us, you work through 25 mock questions in structured set-wise parts — writing, receiving feedback, discussing in class, and writing again.

  5. Week 5Fix the gaps

    Use what the mocks reveal and address it directly

    Mocks are a mirror. Whatever they show — thin application, weak financial analysis, poor governance knowledge or answers that drift from the scenario — this week is for fixing it. Watch for the SCS-specific gaps: writing generically instead of applying to the company, ignoring the command verb, misallocating time across sub-tasks, no planning before writing, and making points without explaining them.

  6. Week 6Past papers

    Write under timed conditions and practise integrating across pillars

    The SCS regularly requires you to draw on E3, P3 and F3 within a single answer. Past papers help you see how the examiner constructs multi-part questions and how integration is rewarded. Pay attention to how high-scoring answers move between strategic analysis, financial evaluation and governance within one response. Unlike some case-study exams, the SCS does not recycle themes — but past papers still help with direction. Keep targeting your specific weak areas.

  7. Week 7Exam week

    Arrive fresh, not frantic

    Knowledge is set by now. Do a final clean read of the pre-seen, review all the mocks you have completed, and focus on execution rather than learning anything new. Rest properly. You got this!

Practice questions

Five scenarios from inside Kwirtmak.

Open any scenario to read the brief from Agata Paluch, Chief Financial Officer. Each question breaks down into tasks with their CIMA-style weighting. Reveal the model answer task by task, or flip on Practice mode to write your attempt first. These five questions are taken from Finntutors’ own mock exam bank and reflect the style, verb usage and scenario-based format of the real SCS exam.

5 scenarios · open and study at your own pace 0/10
Your free gift

Made it this far? Take this with you.

A free Mini Course on the house. And — when you're ready to go all in — the full SCS course, backed by a lifetime pass guarantee from the four-time CIMA Global Excellence Award-winning Finntutors team.

Free · 3-day drip course · A gift from Finntutors

The Free SCS Mini Course

Video walk-throughs of full practice questions, tutor-marked attempts, exam-day technique drills, and a full pre-seen breakdown. No card needed.

  • 12 hand-picked resources
  • One tutor-marked mock
  • HD pre-seen analysis videos
  • No card required
Start the Mini Course →
The full SCS course

Everything you need to pass, in one place.

Built by the four-time CIMA Global Excellence Award-winning Finntutors team. Trusted by hundreds of CIMA students every sitting.

25
Timed mocks, tutor-marked
2/wk
Live cohort classes
24/7
FinnAI on demand
4×
CIMA Award winner

FinnAI · 24/7 SCS tutor

Trained on the pre-seen and industry analysis. Ask anything about the case study, get scenario-specific answers — not generic textbook responses.

Unique to Finntutors

Live cohort classes

Wednesdays & Fridays, 6pm UK. Worked answers written live, real questions answered on the fly, your weak topics revisited until they click. Recordings always available.

Twice every week

Tutor-marked timed mocks

Up to 25 mock questions, set in exam conditions, marked personally by an SCS tutor. Each script comes back with line-by-line feedback so you know exactly what to fix.

Personalised feedback

Pre-seen analysis + compiled notes

The full pre-seen analysis (not just the summary). Industry deep-dive. E3, P3 and F3 compiled notes mapped directly to the blueprint and "I can" statements.

Mapped to the blueprint
Three ways in

Pick the pack that fits you.

For students who want to revise at their own pace, with all the materials in one place.

  • 15 timed mock exams
  • FinnAI 24/7 tutor access
  • Pre-seen & industry analysis
  • E3 / P3 / F3 compiled notes
  • Live class recordings
  • Community access
  • Lifetime pass guarantee

Our most popular option. Everything in On Demand, plus live cohort classes and tutor-marked mocks.

  • 25 timed mock exams
  • Live cohort classes (Wed + Fri, 6pm UK)
  • FinnAI 24/7 tutor access
  • Pre-seen & industry analysis
  • OTQ subject quizzes
  • E3 / P3 / F3 compiled notes
  • Community access
  • Lifetime pass guarantee

Maximum support. Everything in the Full pack plus dedicated private tutor time and priority feedback.

  • Everything in the Full Case Study Pack
  • 10 private 1:1 tutor sessions
  • Personalised study plan
  • Priority feedback on every mock
  • Direct line to your tutor
Lifetime Pass Guarantee

Don't pass your SCS exam? You get free access to all updated materials for the next exam window — provided you attended the classes, attempted all the mocks, and sat the exam. No catch. No expiry.

See the full SCS course

Three packs · payment plans available · students from 40+ countries

Join the SCS WhatsApp community · exam-week tips, preseen breakdowns and live tutor Q&A Join the group